In this blog post I will be covering the two part episodes on the disappearance of a missing woman, Maura Murray, and one episode on a serial killer in west Mesa, Arizona. The two part episode on Maura Murray cover a story about a UMass student who experiences a series of unfortunate events and starts acting strange before she goes missing on a rural road in New Hampshire. One day she emails her professors lying to them and saying there was a death in her family as an excuse to not attend class for a few days. She then withdraws all the money from her bank account, takes her old malfunctioning car that she was instructed not to use and starts driving north towards the White Mountains. She crashes her car into a tree on the way and some witnesses call the police but by the time they arrive she is gone, and has never been found to this day. Some suspect she went missing on purpose, while others believe she may have been a victim of foul play.
The other episode I listened to is about a serial killer who killed over 11 young women and buried their bodies in the West Mesa desert. Most of the women fit a profile of young and unstable. Detectives begin to investigate the pattern of young women with the same look going missing and eventually find the burial ground in the West Mesa. There are suspects but to this day the serial killer has never been found.
For this blog post I tried to choose a story that was published semi recently and an older story to see how the narrative features have changed. The two part on Maura Murray’s case reminds me a lot of some of the other two parts I’ve listened to. It’s not possible to just listen to one episode, the way the story is structured leaves the listener on a cliff hanger after the first episode. The first episode covers a lot of theories related to why Maura may have left and gone missing on purpose, which is also the theory the police strongly believed and published to the public. At the end of this episode, our host Ashley Flowers states that everything that people learned about the case at first is a lie, and there are much darker forces and ‘demons’ at play here that have been uncovered over the years. After hearing this, the listener is really inclined to listen to the second episode as a way to uncover the truth on Maura Murray’s case. There is a bit of bias here as well because it’s the hosts opinion that all the ideas we were fed are a lie, some people believe that it’s true and we will never know because the case is still open. In the second episode Ashley Flowers covers the evidence that supports the theory that there was foul play involved with Maura’s disappearance and she includes a lot of information she failed to cover in the first episode. By the end of the two episodes the listener has all the knowledge on the case but is still pushed to believe that Maura was a victim of foul play because this is what Ashley believes.
The episode I listened to about the West Mesa killer sounded like a slightly more unprofessional version of newer episodes, but I enjoyed that feeling more than the feeling that newer episodes have. This 2017 episode felt a lot more casual, and there was a much larger presence of the co-host Brittany Prawat. The fun banter between the two of them was much more present along with their personal opinions and biases’. The way Ashley narrated the story sounded less robotic and scripted and instead made me feel more like I was in the room with them as they uncovered this story. At times she even stumbled over her words more or took an extra second to say something and although this may seem unprofessional it added a touch of humanity to our hosts. There were also more instances where they related the events to their personal life, such as Ashley stating that at 14 years old she could barely take care of a pet and could never imagine herself taking care of a baby (they were talking about a 14 year old girl with a child who was a victim of the killer). Another example is how they spotlighted a female detective that was put on the case who believed that all the missing girls were connected before they even found the burial sites in the desert. Brittany then goes on to talk about how cool it is that this woman was onto the case before anyone else because of the lack of female representation in crime work (girl power!). Overall, I enjoy the non-chalant style of later episodes more than the informative scripted style of newer episodes.
word count: 823
Enya,
I really loved your blog post. I have heard of the case of Maura Murray previously, and I have always been fascinated by the peculiarities. You describe a technique used where selective details can show extreme bias, and also add for extreme effect. This reminds me of when my high school english class covered literature surrounding the murder of Matthew Shepard. We first discussed all theories that he was murdered because of a drug deal gone wrong, and honestly, I completely would have believed that was the truth. Soon after, we began to look into the details exposing the murder as a hate crime. This ability to warp the perception allows the podcaster (or in my case teacher) to not only keep energy and excitement, but also inform about the importance of bias, and the necessity of understanding the whole picture.
The characteristics that you use to describe the second episode you listened to seem very similar to what i noticed in my podcast, Criminal. By changing the vibe from episode to episode, a podcast can attract a wider range of listeners, helping to lead to their popularity and longevity. I also enjoy the more casual mood usually, especially if it has some humor, as I feel I can connect with the story more. You mention tangents that the hosts went off on, and that reminds me of one of my favorite YouTube series Buzzfeed Unsolved. The atmosphere that is created by seriousness, but also realizing the humorous and noteworthy parts, appeals to many, another reason for its overwhelming success.
-Owen Hanson
Word Count 262