Difference between revisions of "Wilson 1940"
From Commonplace Book
(Created page with "Edmund Wilson. ''To the Finland Station: a Study in the Writing and Acting of History.'' Pub. 1940. Repr. New York Review Books Classics, 2003. *459ff: Two hundred years befo...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Edmund Wilson. ''To the Finland Station: a Study in the Writing and Acting of History.'' Pub. 1940. Repr. New York Review Books Classics, 2003. | Edmund Wilson. ''To the Finland Station: a Study in the Writing and Acting of History.'' Pub. 1940. Repr. New York Review Books Classics, 2003. | ||
| − | *459ff: Two hundred years before, Giambattista Vico, at his books in a far corner of Europe the whole width of the continent away, in asserting that "the social world" was "certainly the work of man," had refrained from going further and declaring, as Grotius had done, that the social institutions of men could be explained in terms of man alone.... In the Catholic city of Naples, in the shadow of the Inquisition, Vico had to keep God in his system. | + | *5: Though Vico had lived and written a hundred years before [Michelet in 1824], he had never been translated into French and was in fact little known outside Italy. |
| − | [...] | + | *Vico had read Francis Bacon, and had decided that it ought to be possible to apply to the study of human history methods similar to those proposed by Bacon for the study of the natural world. |
| − | [460] Lenin in 1917, with a remnant of Vico's God still disguised in the Dialectic, but with no fear of Roman Pope or Protestant Synod, not so sure of the controls of society as the engineer was of the egine that was taking him to Petrograd, yet in a position to calculate the chances with closer accuracy than a hundred to one, stood on the eve of the moment when for the first time in the human exploit the key of a philosophy of history was to fit an historical lock. | + | *7: And: "In that dark night which shoruds from our eyes the most remote antiquity, a light appears which cannot lead us astray; I speak of this incontestable truth: ''the social world is certainly the work of men''; and it follows that one can and should find its principles in the modifications of human intelligence itself. |
| + | *161: | ||
| + | *459ff: Two hundred years before, Giambattista Vico, at his books in a far corner of Europe the whole width of the continent away, in asserting that "the social world" was "certainly the work of man," had refrained from going further and declaring, as Grotius had done, that the social institutions of men could be explained in terms of man alone.... In the Catholic city of Naples, in the shadow of the Inquisition, Vico had to keep God in his system. [...] [460] Lenin in 1917, with a remnant of Vico's God still disguised in the Dialectic, but with no fear of Roman Pope or Protestant Synod, not so sure of the controls of society as the engineer was of the egine that was taking him to Petrograd, yet in a position to calculate the chances with closer accuracy than a hundred to one, stood on the eve of the moment when for the first time in the human exploit the key of a philosophy of history was to fit an historical lock. | ||
Revision as of 17:47, 24 February 2017
Edmund Wilson. To the Finland Station: a Study in the Writing and Acting of History. Pub. 1940. Repr. New York Review Books Classics, 2003.
- 5: Though Vico had lived and written a hundred years before [Michelet in 1824], he had never been translated into French and was in fact little known outside Italy.
- Vico had read Francis Bacon, and had decided that it ought to be possible to apply to the study of human history methods similar to those proposed by Bacon for the study of the natural world.
- 7: And: "In that dark night which shoruds from our eyes the most remote antiquity, a light appears which cannot lead us astray; I speak of this incontestable truth: the social world is certainly the work of men; and it follows that one can and should find its principles in the modifications of human intelligence itself.
- 161:
- 459ff: Two hundred years before, Giambattista Vico, at his books in a far corner of Europe the whole width of the continent away, in asserting that "the social world" was "certainly the work of man," had refrained from going further and declaring, as Grotius had done, that the social institutions of men could be explained in terms of man alone.... In the Catholic city of Naples, in the shadow of the Inquisition, Vico had to keep God in his system. [...] [460] Lenin in 1917, with a remnant of Vico's God still disguised in the Dialectic, but with no fear of Roman Pope or Protestant Synod, not so sure of the controls of society as the engineer was of the egine that was taking him to Petrograd, yet in a position to calculate the chances with closer accuracy than a hundred to one, stood on the eve of the moment when for the first time in the human exploit the key of a philosophy of history was to fit an historical lock.
