Charles Darwin

From Commonplace Book
Revision as of 13:21, 25 March 2018 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Context== *context from Charles Taylor, A Secular Age: everything is in place intellectually, not just from earlier evolutionary theories by Charles Lyell or Chambers et...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Context

  • context from Charles Taylor, A Secular Age: everything is in place intellectually, not just from earlier evolutionary theories by Charles Lyell or Chambers et al., but from secularizing disenchantment, for Darwin to make the coup de grace:
"The earlier cosmos ideas saw the world as fixed, unvarying. But our consciousness of the universe is dominated by the sense that things evolve...this transformation in outlook from a limited, fixed cosmos to a vast, evolving universe starts in the early C17, and is essentially completed in the early C19, though the final terminus might be fixed with the publication of Origin in 1859." (325)
  • the "modern cosmic imaginary" (350) creates the space to wander between secular, religious, material, metaphysical options

Origin

Charles Darwin. "The Origin of Species." Pub. 1859. Darwin: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Philip Appleman. New York: Norton, 2001. Print.

  • If you really take Darwin seriously, he gets rid of teleological development
    • purpose is retroactively proscribed -- the thumb was not made for texting
  • Narrative is inherently teleological arguably (though not necessarily always) - somewhat at odds with an evolutionary worldview
  • sexual selection potentially in tension with survival
  • deeply cautious in the way it unfolds: let's start with the least amount of controversy and build toward grander questions
  • 104 breeding vs. selection: intentional breeding not to create new breeds necessarily: more about taste than an evolutionary plan
  • key intervention is natural selection as the method for evolution
    • contra Lamarck, the mechanism is solely based on inheritance of capability vs. acquired characteristics (which are now coming back in epigenetics)
    • tension around the individual (end result and dead end) - problems for individual agency - interesting for literature because of inheritance determinacy
  • 107ff the struggle for existence
    • struggle for existence is in part symbiosis, dependence, rather than just fighting for resources vs against environment
      • it's not a game with rules and a winner, i.e., Social Darwinism, which reduces complexity of all the relationships that go into successful selection
    • the struggle to pass on genes isn't necessarily a fight over a bone: metaphorically they are fighting over who will have puppies
      • struggle is our metaphor: for other species it's just existence
  • 113 ff. Natural Selection
    • change without design
    • natural selection vs. man's: it's hard for us to understand a non-willful selection process
    • "How fleeting are the wishes and efforts of man!" - like Donne's sermons
    • Nature's disinterestedness is what's so disturbing for Alfred Tennyson for ex.
    • removing anthropomorphism from language: selection without agency or teleology (Beer)
      • it's a struggle: "workmanship" doesn't suffice and he knows it
      • before Gillian Beer lit scholars didn't much care for Darwin
    • it's hard to think past metaphysics, to provide a mechanism by itself that does it (which is what Darwin is trying to do)
  • 134 The great tree
    • when he wants high notes he reaches for metaphor and rhetoric, to Genesis
    • imaginative in the way it creates a tree branch decaying and falling off, which doesn't really happen
    • sacrificing philosophical precision
  • 136 crust of the earth as a "vast museum" (see Black 2000)
  • Key ingredients/influences on Darwin's theory:
    • Charles Lyell -- deep time
    • Malthus -- population -- if all organisms have a lot of offspring the world would be overrun, so clearly many offspring have to die
      • Darwin takes Malthus and says there must be some mechanism for why some die and some don't: scarcity produces change
  • 174: the entangled bank
    • the view this requires is not to look at one species at a time, which we in the humanities don't do
      • a proto-post-humanist move
    • history: understanding underlying mechanisms and energy regimes
    • attending to the non-human in created artifacts has the problem of them still being put there by the author
      • how do you pay attention to what the author didn't? Ex) things that don't do anything in Bleak House (1853)
    • what we think of as human history has been created by works because they help bury the artifacts
  • Vic evolutionary theory picked up on the progressive vision of evolution, where later interpretations saw it as radically rejecting teleology
    • social Darwinism, naturalizing imperialism/conquest
  • concepts circulating by metaphor