Difference between revisions of "Rhizomes"
From Commonplace Book
(Created page with "==Gartler== Mark Gartler. ""Rhizome." Theories of Media: Keywords Glossary. University of Chicago. Accessed 14 Mar 2017. [csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/rhizome.htm URL].") |
(→Gartler) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Gartler== | ==Gartler== | ||
| − | Mark Gartler. | + | Mark Gartler. "Rhizome." Theories of Media: Keywords Glossary. University of Chicago. Accessed 14 Mar 2017. [csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/rhizome.htm URL]. |
| + | *[Rhizome] has been offered as an explanatory framework for network theory and hypertext, '''although a strict reading of Deleuze and Guattari does not suppor these interpretations. Their rhizome is non-hierarchical, heterogeneous, mulitiplicitous, and acentered. | ||
| + | * Deleuze and Guattari arrive at the rhizome by way of analyzing the book. | ||
| + | *One of D and G's criticisms of the tree is that it does not offer an adequate explanation of multiplicity. | ||
| + | *the rhizome has no unique source from which all development occurs. | ||
| + | * [Trees and rhizomes] are not completely repellant however, because the rhizome is able to infiltrate the tree; fluidity and openness infect the closed, unchanging, and static. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Deleuze & Guattari== | ||
| + | *17: [mode of organization in which] all individuals are interchangeable, defined only by their state at a given moment - such that the local operations are coordinated and the final, global result synchronized without a central agency. | ||
| + | *21: The rhizome is reducible neither to the One more the multiple...it is comprised not of units but of dimensions, or rather '''directions in motion'''. | ||
| + | * [the rhizome is] defined solely as a circulation of states | ||
Revision as of 10:57, 19 March 2017
Gartler
Mark Gartler. "Rhizome." Theories of Media: Keywords Glossary. University of Chicago. Accessed 14 Mar 2017. [csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/rhizome.htm URL].
- [Rhizome] has been offered as an explanatory framework for network theory and hypertext, although a strict reading of Deleuze and Guattari does not suppor these interpretations. Their rhizome is non-hierarchical, heterogeneous, mulitiplicitous, and acentered.
- Deleuze and Guattari arrive at the rhizome by way of analyzing the book.
- One of D and G's criticisms of the tree is that it does not offer an adequate explanation of multiplicity.
- the rhizome has no unique source from which all development occurs.
- [Trees and rhizomes] are not completely repellant however, because the rhizome is able to infiltrate the tree; fluidity and openness infect the closed, unchanging, and static.
Deleuze & Guattari
- 17: [mode of organization in which] all individuals are interchangeable, defined only by their state at a given moment - such that the local operations are coordinated and the final, global result synchronized without a central agency.
- 21: The rhizome is reducible neither to the One more the multiple...it is comprised not of units but of dimensions, or rather directions in motion.
- [the rhizome is] defined solely as a circulation of states
