Difference between revisions of "Bleak House (1853)"
From Commonplace Book
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Page #s for Penguin ed. | Page #s for Penguin ed. | ||
+ | ==General Notes== | ||
*14-15: the ways the fog fuddles positivist sensory knowledge: we are in a space where scientific epistemology is rendered vague | *14-15: the ways the fog fuddles positivist sensory knowledge: we are in a space where scientific epistemology is rendered vague | ||
Line 183: | Line 184: | ||
* 908 othello and mrs snagsby | * 908 othello and mrs snagsby | ||
* 932-3: could we take Skimpole's anti-capitalism seriously? Could Leigh hunt be a guide? | * 932-3: could we take Skimpole's anti-capitalism seriously? Could Leigh hunt be a guide? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Bibliographical Notes== | ||
+ | * Per Sandra Kroupa (ask her for dealer name): "Talked to my dealer expert at the Book Fair in CA—the book never came out as a 3 vol. novel in England. If there is one, it is a unique rebinding of the parts." Caroline Levine makes this error, as do others. |
Revision as of 16:26, 20 February 2017
Charles Dickens Page #s for Penguin ed.
General Notes
- 14-15: the ways the fog fuddles positivist sensory knowledge: we are in a space where scientific epistemology is rendered vague
- "No one knows for certain, because no one cares" (Miss Flite)
- 16 document/paper based economy of knowledge, unstable signifiers like Flite's "documents"
* 26: which lady D enters through knowing Nemo's handwriting
- Ch 3 beginning of Esther's narrative "my portion of these pages" -- the paper object is epistemologically or even ontologically unstable here
* 40 Esther's narrative is a legal document itself
- Track writing (and how forms of knowing otherwise are undepenable but even writing is unsteady)
* 27 * 31 * 32 * 38 periods * 40 * 43 * * 47 * 53 caddy * 60 * 66-79: Krook's * 73: cutting prints and pasting to wall * 76 krook copies but can't read * 117 the Growlery * 119 * 123 rags tracts and the charitable paper economy * 149-50 Guppy’s proposal in legal discourse * 154 Snagsby — law stationer * Ghosts and paper? Peffer, plus 156 * 158 Rolls’ Yard * 159-164 Tulkinghorn -> Nemo * 170 * 195 * 230 * 235 * 236 krook teaching himself * 257-60 Jo's illiteracy and how Tom all Alone's isn't represented in writing * Inadequacy of written representation of the social scales up to the novel itself (following Levine 2009) * 276 * 284 business like * 300 * 316 * 317 * 325 * 328 krook is rags like omf * 344 * 352 * 358-9 xian sign * 371 * 385 * 388 * 396 * 403 * 408 * 415 * 429-30 hawdon nemo * 434 * 447 * 459 * 462-3 * 467 * 477 * 486 Charley learning to write * 508 * 511-2 * 515 * 520 * 532 * 534 lady d's letters * 552 * 556 * 559 * 563 * 569 * 575 * 580 * 595-6 * 609 * 612 * 614 self conscious about prosing...in BH * 615 * 622 * 629 * 632-3 clearing krook's * 652 * 654 * 675 * 684 * 688 * 700 * 711 * 721-2 * 728 * 731 Jo's epitaph * 744 * 768 * 772 * 776 * 780 * 784 dusty papers/Richard's mind * 805-6 * 808 * 820 Bucket tells sir l in the library * 824 * 835 * 842 * 848-851 * 853 * 854 * 858 * 863 * 866 * 867 another likeness of lady d circulating, following her into the dark * 880 * 887 * 895 * 900 * 906 * 909 * 919 * 920 * 921 * 932 * 935 * 944-5 the other will * 948 * 950 * 953 * 957 * 960 * 964 * 972 * 974 * 983 * 985 * 987
- 37 pie wrapped in paper
- 44 Esther as a blank text for ada to confide in
- 93 a little clutch of Shakespeare
- 105 genre positioning at Chesney Wold (fairy tale/fancy vs Gothic)
- 115 Esther narrativizing space/landscape outside BH
- 118 starting to explain chancery case
- 121 Wiglomeration
- 122 Narrative imperatives of different genres and characters, Tom J and the case vs Esther's own biography (self-effacement)
* The way not knowing, narrative indeterminacy, is associated with happiness
- 127 the Pardiggles even more entertaining than the Jellybys
- 135 strange that he demurs to narrate the perspective of the poor (rem of Forster's remark)
- 177 Jo’s intro
- 183 Lady D “sees everything"
- 197 Richard's character shaped by chancery
- 214 who is the dark young surgeon? Woodcourt 237 why the deferral?
- 225 -- Turveydrop pairs with Sir Leicester (?), Skimpole and Boythorn
* Actually he pairs with Mrs Jellyby but all are useless in their own way
- 228 levelling age/deportment
- 251 Gridley the system vs individuals
- 282 Richard behaves like someone in poverty by buying things -- better to invest capital in property than in something abstract to that pov
- 292 lady d's face as a broken glass to Esther
- 310 what does engage for Jo's moving on mean?
- 312 What is mrs Chadband's connection to Esther? Was mrs Rachael 398
- 333 smallweeds and compound interest
- 347 hawdon
- 371 Richard
- 385 Charley shuttled from the smallweeds to bleak house -- how labor is the vector of the network so often
- 406 mrs snagsby perceiving the network of all people, jealousy and suspicion as vector
- 451 conflict between ideological time schemes
- 458 sir leicester perusing the backs of his books
- 464 guppy connecting lady d and Esther
- 474 mr jellyby gets out of bankruptcy by "going through the gazette"?
- 507 Weevle and Snagsby tasting Krook on the air...
- 523 snagsby keeps mentioning fate but it's not adequate to the narrative
- 566 ms flite
- 575 Esther's negative subjectivity or affect, the absence of affective response being narrated that's so revealing
- 583 sentimentally exculpating lady d
- 621 English law making business for itself
- 643-5 class and politics with Leicester
- 672-3 how morally culpable should we hold John J for his apologizing for Skimpole and Richard's subsequent fall under the influence he and of Vholes?
- 732 metafictive -- fate as engine of plot, of networking
* Bucket's book of fate 806
- 735 indeterminate Shakespeare reference
- 795-6 the negative position of bucket in the narrative rel to george -- detective a bit more ambivalent heee and in Moonstone vs later detective fiction
- Ch 58 886ff. he's quite powerful in his elegiac mode (though still funny)
- 902 Esther a pattern
- 908 othello and mrs snagsby
- 932-3: could we take Skimpole's anti-capitalism seriously? Could Leigh hunt be a guide?
Bibliographical Notes
- Per Sandra Kroupa (ask her for dealer name): "Talked to my dealer expert at the Book Fair in CA—the book never came out as a 3 vol. novel in England. If there is one, it is a unique rebinding of the parts." Caroline Levine makes this error, as do others.