Difference between revisions of "Victorian Novel Seminar Review Essay"

Revision as of 18:54, 15 February 2017

• Approaches to print culture post-Leah Price
  • book history
  • media theory/studies
  • periodicals studies
  • eco-book history (Gidal)
  • information/library history
  • Liz Miller, Leah Price — maybe not so narrow time-wise
  • Priya Joshi, In Another Country
  • How those fields meet and how a book history approach intersects with and is different from reception history
    • Joshi and Gidal are reception history
    • James Seacord Victorian Sensation
    • Distinct from binding and wood pulp —> literal material history is not so much done (ecological/industrial underpinnings)
    • Wooden Os
  • acid, hazardousness in print industry
• Use this to build an exam list
• Reception history is important but I (am/am not) doing that —> where you want to go and what you want to find

Knowledge Gaps

• Labor
• Straight up material history
• More granular periodization (cf. Miller 2013 and Leckie 2015)

Reading List

• Price 2012 - Price, Leah. How to Do Things with Books in Victorian Britain.
• Gidal 2015 - Gidal, Eric. Ossianic Unconformities: Bardic Poetry in the Industrial Age. University of Virginia Press, 2015. Print.
• Ten Books that Shaped the British Empire (which chapters?)

Potential Sources

• trawl Leckie review essay in VLC
• Miller, Slow Print
• Mussell, C19 Press in Digital Age
• Worth, Imperial Media
• Shannon, Dickens Reynolds Mayhew on Wellington St
• Toni Wheeler(?), Victorians and Information
• Hughes, Linda K. “SIDEWAYS!: Navigating the Material (Ity) of Print Culture.” Victorian Periodicals Review 47.1 (2014): 1–30. Print.
• Stauffer, Andrew M. “Victorian Paperwork.” Victorian Poetry 41.4 (2003): 526–531. Print.
• John, Juliet, and Matthew Bradley. Reading and the Victorians. Ed. Juliet John. Farnham: Farnham : Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2015. Web.
• Gitelman, Lisa, and Geoffrey B Pingree. New Media, 1740-1915. MIT Press, 2004. Print.
• Hack, Daniel. The Material Interests of the Victorian Novel. University of Virginia Press, 2005. Print.
• King, Andrew, Alexis Easley, and John (John S.) Morton. The Routledge Handbook to Nineteenth-Century British Periodicals and Newspapers. Ed. Andrew King, Alexis Easley, and John (John S.) *Morton. Abingdon, Oxon : Abingdon, Oxon , 2016. Print.
• Krajewski, Marcus. Paper Machines: About Cards & Catalogs, 1548-1929. MIT Press, 2011. Print.
• Lee, Maurice S. “Searching the Archives with Dickens and Hawthorne: Databases and Aesthetic Judgment after the New Historicism.” ELH 79.3 (2012): 747–771. Print.
• Mussell, James. “‘Scarers in Print’: Media Literacy from Our Mutual Friend to Friend Me on Facebook.” Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 21 (2015): 163–179. Print.
• Mussell, James. “THE PASSING OF PRINT: Digitising Ephemera and the Ephemerality of the Digital.” Media History 18.1 (2012): 77–92. Web. 15 Jan. 2015.
• Parikka, Jussi. The Anthrobscene. University of Minnesota Press, 2014. Print.
• Parikka Media Archaeology
• Rigney, Ann. “Things and the Archive: Scott’s Materialist Legacy.” Scottish Literary Review 7.2 (2015): 13–34. Print.
• Stauffer, Andrew M. “Ruins of Paper: Dickens and the Necropolitan Library.” Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net: 47 (2007): n. pag. Web. 15 Jan. 2015.
• Young, Alan R. “John Dicks’s Illustrated Edition of ‘Shakspere for the Millions.’” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 106.3 (2012): 285–310. Print.